Congratulations Animas High Committee

"State board OKs Animas High charter"
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 19, 2007 Durango Herald

After more than a year of planning, a five member board of community minded parents has gained the approval of the State's Charter Institute to move forward with plans to open a new, small high school for Durango area students next August.

Much more work now lies ahead to make the dream a reality. Interested families and students can contact organizers through the Animas High School website.

Read more the educational philosophy and research behind this proposal.

Congratulations and thanks to the committee for their hard work in creating this opportunity for Durango families.

Supporting the new Animas High Charter proposal

Back in 2002, with an $84.5 million bond for school construction, many of us tried to get a "small schools" conversation started - all the research showed small schools outperforming the large comprehensive model of two thousand students.

When the superintendent told the school board that a "second high school" would cost an extra million dollars a year right off the bat, members decided not to "go there" and a public conversation about school models never happened, except in the Letters to the Editor pages. The public information campaign to get out the vote then assured voters that "small schools research didn't apply in communities like ours."

Fast forward five years -- community organizers today have created a very comprehensive proposal for a "small high school" (450 students) and will be engaged in the next few weeks in presenting their model to the Colorado Charter School Institute.

Browse the website of Animas High School. Read the Durango Herald's recent excellent editorial. Take a look at the educational philosophy and research behind this proposal and think about our options.

Those of us who believe in choices, flexibility, and innovation are excited by the positive energy being directed toward such a wonderful project. Read about their model - the original High Tech High in San Diego.

“Building strong school communities means fighting the social trend of bigger everything.”
--Ron Berger, An Ethic of Excellence

AND if you wish to show support, the best way is to attend a public forum sponsored by the Colorado Charter Institute Monday 9/24/07 at 6:30 to the Durango Rec Center. They need to hear what parents, students and community members think about the need for educational choices for our Durango students.

NOTE: The CCI forum had standing room only. See Herald 9/25/07 Parents turn out in force to support Animas High

Saturday is "School Board Education Day"

Great news!

If you've ever thought about serving on one of our local school boards, now is the time to find out what's involved and the League of Women Voters is going to make this easy for you!

You are invited to a working breakfast educational session this Sat. a.m, 8/11/07, from 8:30 to noon at Mercy Medical Center, Conference Room A, in their Three Springs location at Grandview off Highway 160. Call Pam Patton at 884-2206 for more information.

The current presidents of all three local school boards wrote a complete story with deadline dates and locations for filing nomination petitions in Sunday's Herald.(Take Your Seat: Durango Herald Aug. 5, 2007)

With 11 seats open in November in Durango, Ignacio and Bayfield, and many new arrivals in the 9-R system, we look forward to the exciting possibilities that may unfold this fall.

“Survey Results Criticize, Praise” Durango Herald, Sunday, July 8, 2007

Kudos to the Durango Herald and the unidentified “third party” who provided the newspaper with a copy of 9-R’s “secret” survey in July. We were not alone in hoping for improvements in the high school culture and the 9-R work environment.

Tackling the 64 pages of single spaced comments by teachers, staff, students and parents now might lead to a sea change in culture and communications -- between teachers, parents, the public and District staff and students – but only if all parties are included in an honest community dialogue.

While District administrators insist this survey will stifle “frank and honest discussion,” we believe the opposite - coming clean and facing real concerns head-on is 9-R’s best path out of its recent quagmire. Especially with new personnel this fall, let's hope the District' sheds its mantra of "Don't listen to naysayers and critics; let's move on!"

In refusing two open records requests (of 4/21 and 5/1/07), Supt. Barter’s reluctance to allow the public to read any “raw data” now looks increasingly self-serving. She insisted that “personally identifiable information” would be harmful to those who made comments - but reading comments printed in Sunday's Herald suggests that the harm would be to the superintendent herself, and at least one other high level administrator, definitely not the teachers she has claimed to be protecting.

According to the Herald, negative comments about 9-R Central Administration were made by some 25 staff members and positive comments by 13.

Some of the 2006-07 staff comments resonate with a report made two years ago by outside consultant Robert Tschirki. 2005 Herald story.

"9-R embodies the philosophy of: when we want your opinion, we’ll give it to you. Anyone who speaks out against any idea forwarded by administration is harassed, bullied and intimidated into submission.”

“Teachers feel there will be retribution if they get out of line."

With over 1500 comments on everything from school climate and size, drug and alcohol use, student safety, the open campus at lunchtime to the high school's dress code, survey results could form the basis of a productive community conversation -- but that cannot happen if 9-R continues to deny their relevance.

A majority of board members have indicated that the comments themselves are more useful than the quantitative synthesis substituted in deference to teachers who feared that a public reading would make their lives more difficult.

This is a community that supports its teachers. Barter's claim that it would be harmful to allow the public to read 9-R survey results has an increasingly hollow ring. To ignore them because they aren't "scientifically sound" doesn't make good sense. To find out more does.

9-R Board public forum a success!

It may have been only 15 parents and citizens who showed up last week, but the information and ideas flowed freely. Individuals who arrived with their individual concerns, left with new acquaintances and a sense of who are board members are, what they care about.

Congratulations to this "new" board for encouraging the public to help prioritize some opportunities and actions that will make our schools even better.

This is what Policy Governance requires - "linking" with the "owners of the system."

What a difference in mood and tone from the adversarial settings that have been standard fare for parents in the past.

And stay tuned for details of discussion items moving to the center of a public conversation. Better yet, share your own concerns here for comment. But next time you read of a 9-R Board open forum, make arrangements to attend; it will be worth your while and we will all benefit.

Example: A homeschooling parent whose son will enter DHS this fall raised a concern about dropping enrollment in arts and theater classes that may be inadvertently be caused by new graduation requirements. The groups urged further exploration of graduation requirements and a commitment to flexibility - and a commitment to individualized plans for all students. This is a community that thinks out of the box and wants every child to have an appropriate educational path.

Progress!

Read story in Herald about May 15, 2007 forum.

Supreme Court levels legal playing field for parents

Justices Rule on Education Lawsuits

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: May 21, 2007

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Parents need not hire a lawyer to sue public school districts over their children's special education needs, the Supreme Court ruled Monday.

The decision came in the case of an autistic boy from Ohio, whose parents argued they were effectively denied access to the courts because they could not afford a lawyer.

Federal law gives every child the right to a free appropriate public education, which in the case of special needs children sometimes means enrollment in a private facility.

But most federal courts had concluded that parents who are not lawyers and who want to challenge decisions have to hire an attorney to represent them.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the court, said parents have legal rights under the Individuals With Disabilities in Education Act, the main federal special education law.

''They are, as a result, entitled to prosecute IDEA claims on their own behalf,'' Kennedy said.

The court sided with Jeff and Sandee Winkelman and their son, Jacob, in their fight against the Parma, Ohio school district.

The Winkelmans can't afford a lawyer or the cost of private schooling for Jacob. Neither parent is a lawyer.

The parents objected to the Parma schools' plan to educate Jacob at a public school. They wanted the district to pay for his $56,000 yearly enrollment in a private school that specializes in educating autistic children.

The Winkelmans have spent about $30,000 in legal fees since first contesting Jacob's treatment in 2003. Jeff Winkelman has taken a second job while his wife has researched previous court rulings and written her own filings.

Sandee Winkelman said she might press the case on behalf of her 9-year-old son with one of several attorneys who have offered to represent the family for free. If that doesn't work out, she said, the family would proceed without an attorney.

''I would prefer to give Jacob the best chance with an attorney. That's the best-case scenario,'' she said after the ruling was announced. ''I'm very pleased. It restored a lot of faith I have in the system.''

It is unclear how many parents forgo lawsuits because they can't afford them, although advocates for disabled children said in court papers that most parents of disabled children lack the means to hire a lawyer.

Parents unhappy with a district's plan can appeal the decision through an administrative process. If they remain dissatisfied, they can file a civil lawsuit on their child's behalf, federal courts have said. At that point, however, most courts have said the parents must hire a lawyer.

Whether Jacob should have private schooling at public expense was not before the Supreme Court, only his parents' right to go into federal court without a lawyer.

The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled in the school district's favor. Monday's ruling overturned that decision.

The case number is Winkelman v. Parma City School District, 05-983.

What's on the big list so far?

The 9-R Board has compiled a list of concerns which can be accessed here. We hope others are added. Here are a few that we have heard and believe must be addressed if real change is to occur.

Communication with the public
If Policy Governance continues, commit to using the whole model. Continue to build in opportunities for unfiltered information exchange between you and the public.

District culture Make sure that teachers, parents, students and community members are being treated respectfully. Connect the dots. Look carefully at all the new school choices popping up in our community. Are things as rosy as 9-R's press releases suggest? We repeat: find ways to listen to parents, students, teachers and community.

Dyslexia and other special education programs
What is behind the attitude from top administration that has produced so much angst? The exciting fields of brain research have revolutionized approaches to learning disabilities. Have 9-R teachers been offered the professional development to keep current? Why so much denial? How has 9-R responded to concerned parents?

9-R and dyslexia: Parents’ concerns deserve public discussion
9-R Touts ability to help dyslexic
Mother requests waiver for foreign language
Liberty School to open in September: private school to tackle dyslexia

Go back to "culture" above and ask: are top officials treating everyone with respect?

Denial and defensive posture of Administration
Is "never having to say you're sorry" the most helpful strategy for dealing with public and staff? Track legal expenses for patterns behind lawsuits against 9-R.

9-R's $35 million budget -big picture thinking?
Make public participation in 9-R budget matters a priority. This community is deeply interested in choices made for academic programs. There are many models for including public in prioritizing expenditures.